The Quest for Systemic Islamic Economic Studies from Interdisciplinary Perspectives


  • Zainal Abidin IAIN Madura



Method, Islamic studies, Interdisciplinary


The method in Islamic studies is a necessity for the reason that  with a correct and accurate method, Islamic study becomes an interesting exploration in the academia. In  Islamic Studies courses,   issues of  life problems associated with  Islam  need to be handled. This paper discerns the challenges and opportunities  that arise  in  Islamic studies and relate these to the development of the Islamic economic realm. This article argues that Islamic studies is faced with a huge prospect , namely a reform at the philosophical level. Hence, concepts to enrich the perspectives using a multi-dimensional approach are suggested. Besides, strengthening the field of text supplementation by presenting an understanding of hermeneutics and understanding the concept of maqasid shari'a  are also encouraged. It concludes with an obsession    to present  a sensitive and integrated Islam with modernity.


Download data is not yet available.


Adam, Charles J. (1976). “Islamic Religion Tradition” in Leonard Binder (ed). The Study of Middle east. New York: John Wilwy and Son.
Al Fadl, Khaled Abu. (2004). Atas Nama Tuhan; Dari Fikih Otoriter Ke Fikih Otoritatis, translated by R. Cecep Lukman Yasin. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu semesta.
Al Jabiri, Muhammad Abid. (1991). Takwin Al Aql Al Arabiy, Al Markaz Al Tsaqafi Al Arabi Casablanca, cet. IV.
Al-Effendi, Abdel Wahab (ed). (2001). Rethinking islam and Modernity; Esaays in Honour of fathi osman. Leicester UK: The islamic Foundation.
Auda, Jasser. (2008). Maqashid al Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A system Approach. London: TIIT.
Cohen. (1997). Global Diasporas: An Introductoin.London: UCL Press.
Cox, A. James L.A. (2006). Guide to The Phenomenology of Religion: Key Figure, Formative Influences and Subsequent Debates. New York: The Open University.
Fananani, Muhyar. (2008). Metode Studi Islam: Aplikasi Sosiologi pengetahuan sebagai Cara Pandang. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Fazlurrahman. (1985). Islam and Modernity Transformation of intellectual Tradition, translated. Ahsin Muhammad. Bandung: penerbit Pustaka.
Knott, Kim. “Insider/ Outsider” in John R. Hinnels (ed.). (2005). The Routlegde Companion to The Study of Religion.New York: Routledge
Pierce, Charles Sanders. “Belief, Inquiry and Meaning” in Milton K. Munitz, 1981. Contemporary Analysis Philosophy. London: Collier Mac Millan Publisher.
Rabi, Ibrahim M. Abu “A Post-September 11 Critical Assesment of Modern Islamic History in Ian Markham dan Ibrahim M. Abu Rabi. (2002). 11 September; Religius Perspective on the Cause and Consequences, Oxford, One World Publication.
Saeed, Abdullah. (2006). Interpreting the Quran.London and New York: Roudledge.
Sahrodi, Jamali. (2008). Metodologi Studi Islam, Menelusuri Jejak Historis Kajian Islam ala Sarjana Orientalis. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Schwartz, Stephen Sulaiman. (2007). Dua Wajah Islam: Moderatisme dan Fundamentalisme dalam wacana global, translated by Hodri Ariev. Jakarta: The Wahid Institute.
Zaid, Nasr Hamid Abu. (1994). Naqd al Khitab Al Din ,Kairo: Sina li Al Nashr.
______. Dawair al khouf ; Qiraah fi khitab al marah terj.Moch. Nur Ikhwan dan Moch. Syamsul hadi. (2003). Dekontruksi Gender: Kritik Wacana Perempuan Dalam Islam.Yogyakarta: SAMHA.




How to Cite

Abidin, Zainal. “The Quest for Systemic Islamic Economic Studies from Interdisciplinary Perspectives”. IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 11, no. 1 (April 1, 2022): 125–138. Accessed April 13, 2024.