UU ITE Dalam Perspektif Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi

  • Atikah Mardhiya Rohmy Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Teguh Suratman Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Arini Indah Nihayaty Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya

Abstract

The industrial revolution 4.0 has an impact on the development of law, government, and social justice. The era of globalization 4.0 causes changes in almost all sectors of human life, especially the economic and technological sectors. The Information and Electronic Transaction Law, abbreviated as UU ITE, must be able to protect various legal interests to protect freedom of speech, express opinions orally and in writing. In addition, it is related to legal interests to protect the freedom of communication and obtain information as rights that are constitutional rights of citizens. The development of information and communication technology requires the government to make UU ITE. This article discusses the implementation of criminal law enforcement through UU ITE, which makes the digital world the target for applying these regulations. UU ITE must be able to bring enthusiasm to keep Indonesia's digital space clean, healthy, ethical and productive. In a criminal case with a restorative justice paradigm, the judge does not only decide based on the law alone, but also considers justice for all parties (victims, perpetrators of crimes, and the community). Court decisions should provide justice, benefit, and legal certainty, and contain philosophical, juridical and sociological foundations so that they are systematic and comprehensive.


Keywords:Criminal Law, Information and Communication Technology, UU ITE

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antonius Sudirman, Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya, Penerbit: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.
Andrew von Hirsch, Julian V. Roberts, Anthony Bottoms, Kent Roach And Mara Schiff, Restorative Justice And Criminal Justice: Competing Or Reconcilable Paradigms?, Hart Publishing Oxford And Portland, Oregon, 2003.
Bagir Manan, DiskusiPublik UU ITE: Penghinaan/Pencemaran Nama BaikMenurut KUHP, UU ITE, RKUHP'secara daring, Kamis (19/3/2021).
BayuDwiAnggono, DiskusiPublik UU ITE: Penghinaan/Pencemaran Nama BaikMenurut KUHP, UU ITE, RKUHP'secara daring, Kamis (19/3/2021).
Dennis Sulivan& Larry Tifft, 2006, Handbook Of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective, Routledge Taylor Francis Group, London And New York.
Eddy HiariejdalamDiskusiPublikUndang-UndangInformasi dan TransaksiElektronik, Yogyakarta, Kamis, 18 Maret 2021, detikNews.
Eva AchjaniZulfa, Konsep Dasar Restorative Justice, disampaikandalam acara PelatihanHukumPidana Dan Kriminologi “Asas-AsasHukumPidana Dan Kriminologi Serta PerkembanganDewasaIni”, KerjasamaFakultasHukumUniversitas Gadjah Madadengan Masyarakat HukumPidana Dan Kriminologi, Yogyakarta, 23-27 Februari 2014.
James Dignan, Understanding Victims And Restorative Justice, Open University Press, 2005.
Jaja Ahmad Jayus, “Pembangunan Hukum dan KeadilanHarusSesuai di Era RevolusiIndustri 4.0” saatmenyampaikan keynote speech dalam “The 2nd International Conference on Law, Governance and Social Justice (ICoLGaS)”, diselenggarakanFakultasHukumUniversitasJenderalSoedirman, pada tanggal 3 – 4 November 2020.
Johnny Ibrahim, Teori&MetodologiPenelitianHukumNormatif, Bayumedia Publishing, Malang, 2007.
LBH Pers, SAFEnet, ICJR, IJRS, YLBHI, Greenpeace, KontraS, ELSAM, LBH M https://id.safenet.or.id/2021/02/rilis-bersama-koalisi-masyarakat-sipil logikakeliru dalam-rencana-pemerintah-menyusun-pedoman-interpretasi-terhadap-uu ite/masyarakat, Imparsial, AJI Indonesia, diakses pada 18/02/2021.
Lexy J. Moleong, “MetodologiPenelitianKualitatif”, Bandung, RosdaKarya, 1989.
Technical Education and Skills Development Authority. 2016. Technological Change is Coming: The Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Philippe Nonet & Philip Selznick,.Law and Society in Transition. Toward Responsive Law, Harper Colophon Books, New York, 1978. Telahditerjemahkansebagai: HukumResponsif. Pilihan di Masa Transisi, Huma, Jakarta, 2003.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, PenelitianHukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.
SatjiptoRahardjo, “EksaminasiPubliksebagaiManifestasiKekuatanOtonomi Masyarakat dalamPenyelenggaraanHukum,” dalamSusanti Adi Jugroho et al, EksaminasiPublik: Partisipasi Masyarakat MengawasiPeradilan, ICW, Jakarta, 2003.
SoerjonoSoekanto, dan Sri Mamudji, PenelitianHukumNormatif, Cetakan ke-8, PT. Raja GrafindoPersada, Jakarta, 2004.
SofyanSitompul, https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/artikel/4475/menjaga-wibawa-dan-martabat-peradilan-melalui-protokol-persidangan-dan-keamanan, diaksesSenin, 11 Januari 2021.
Wayne R. Lafave, Principle Of Criminal Law, West A Thomson Reuters Bussiness, 2010.
WahyudiDjafar, DiskusiPublik UU ITE: Penghinaan/Pencemaran Nama BaikMenurut KUHP, UU ITE, RKUHP' secara daring, Kamis (19/3/2021).
https://elsam.or.id/urgensi-revisi-menyeluruh-uu-ite-beberapa-isu-penting/ Jakarta, 18 Februari 2021.
https://infopublik.id/kategori/sorot-politik-hukum/514132/kaji-ulang-uu-ite-denganpendekatan-keadilan-restoratif# ,Minggu, 28 Februari 2021.
https://yoursay.suara.com/news/2021/01/11/185052/meninjau-uu-ite-denganteori-gustav-radbruch-langgar-tiga-nilai-hukum?page=all, 11 Januari 2021.
https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5551447/revisi-uu-ite-tak-sentuh-pasal-karetcuma-penambahan-penjelasan, Kamis, 29 Apr 2021.
https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/pidana-di-uu-ite-efektif-menjerat-pengguna medsos-hingga-oktober-ada-324-kasus, Minggu, 01 November 2020.
https://theconversation.com/uu-ite-dan-merosotnya-kebebasan-berekspresi individu-di-indonesia-126043.
Published
2021-08-12
How to Cite
ROHMY, Atikah Mardhiya; SURATMAN, Teguh; NIHAYATY, Arini Indah. UU ITE Dalam Perspektif Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 309-339, aug. 2021. ISSN 2686-1100. Available at: <https://ejournal.iaisyarifuddin.ac.id/index.php/dakwatuna/article/view/1202>. Date accessed: 17 sep. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.36835/dakwatuna.v7i2.1202.
Section
Articles