The Government’s Role for Facing the Fragmentation of Religious Authority in Da’wa Activity: Lessons Learned From Malaysia and Singapore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54471/dakwatuna.v9i2.2479Keywords:
Media, Ulama, Religious Authority, Malaysia, SingaporeAbstract
My previous research on Pandalungan Kiai as a mediatized world shows a complicated case of negotiation between Internet and religion. From mediatization perspective, we can see a clear dynamic interplay between Internet and Pandalungan Kiai as each of them try to influence one another. This interplay is actually the nature of a mediatization process which, furthermore, leads to an interesting phenomenon of the rhizomatic fragmentation of religious authority causing many uncontrolled Islamic discourses to emerge. As corollary to that phenomenon, this article questions the role of the state in controlling the religious diversity of its people and the emergence of various Islamic discourses to be able to give a proper response to the fragmentation. This current research dedicated to critically unpack the problem by focusing on the case of Malaysia and Singapore as each share similar socio-cultural life. The data collected through observation and interview with 22 informants consisted of imams, asatizs, scholars, and local civilians in Malaysia and Singapore during my research field work in November and December 2018. This study found that the two countries implemented a strict certification policy for religious leaders to regulate the diversity of religious life. This fact leads this article to conclude the importance of the role of the government in making strict rules for religious leaders to be able to face the various consequences of the rhizomatic fragmentation of religious authority caused by the coming of (new) media in da’wa activities.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, W. J. (2013). Religious Representation in Secular Singapore: A Case Study of MUIS and Pergas. Asian Survey, 53(6), 1182–1204. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2013.53.6.1182
Adil, D. M. A. M. (2018, December 28). Is Malaysia a secular state? NST Online. https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2018/12/444567/malaysia-secular-state
Adil, M. A. M. (2015). The Federal Constitution: Is Malaysia a Secular State ? Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 6(1), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.12816/0009903
Akhmetova, E., & Jaafar, M. I. (2020). RELIGIOUS EXTREMISM AND RADICALISATION OF MUSLIMS IN MALAYSIA: Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 5(1), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol5iss1pp104-123
Ali Ghadafi. (2018, December 20). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
Anthony Black. (2009). Religious authority and the state. In R. Pasnau, The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy (pp. 537–550). Cambridge University Press.
Azra, A. (2016). Kontestasi Pemikiran Islam Indonesia Kontemporer. Studia Islamika, 23(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v23i1.2905
Bayat, A. (2011). Pos-Islamisme. LKiS.
Bin Hassan, M. H., & Pereire, K. G. (2006). An Ideological Response to Combating Terrorism – The Singapore Perspective. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 17(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592310601060815
Bouvier, G. (2015). What is a discourse approach to Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media: Connecting with other academic fields? Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2015.1042381
Bunt, G. R. (2003). Islam in the digital age: E-jihad, online fatwas, and cyber Islamic environments. Pluto Press.
Bunt, G. R. (2009). iMuslims: Rewiring the house of Islam. Hurst & Co.
Bunt, G. R. (2018). Hashtag Islam: How cyber-Islamic environments are transforming religious authority. The University of North Carolina Press.
Campbell, H. (2005). Spiritualising the Internet. Uncovering Discourses and Narratives of Religious Internet Usage. Online – Heidelberg Journal of Religions on the Internet: Volume 01.1 Special Issue on Theory and Methodology. https://doi.org/DOI:10.11588/heidok.00005824
Camroux, D. (1996). State Responses to Islamic Resurgence in Malaysia: Accommodation, Co-Option, and Confrontation. Asian Survey, 36(9), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645535
Centre for Islamic Development Management Studies (ISDEV) Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM),11800 Pulau Pinang, Rosdi, M. S. M., Shafie, N. H. M., & Centre for Islamic Development Management Studies (ISDEV) Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM),11800 Pulau Pinang. (2016). DECLARATION OF MALAYSIA AS AN ISLAMIC STATE IN THE ERA TUN DR MAHATHIR MOHAMAD’S GOVERNANCE: IMPLICATIONS TOWARDS POLITICAL ECONOMICS IN ISLAMIC WAYS. International Journal of Management and Economics Invention. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijmei/v2i3.01
Christopher Helland. (2000). Religion online/online religion and virtual communitas. In Jeffrey K. Hadden & Douglas E. Cowan (Eds.), Religion on the Internet: Research Prospects and Promises. Elsevier Science.
Chua, B. H., Murdoch University, & Asia Research Centre. (2005). Taking group rights seriously: Multiracialism in Singapore. Murdoch University, Asia Research Centre.
David L Vancil. (1993). Rhetoric and Argumentation. Allyn and Bacon.
Firdaus Bin Yahya. (2018, November 16). MANDATORY ASATIZAH RECOGNITION SCHEME. Pergas Blog. https://blog.pergas.org.sg/mandatory-asatizah-recognition-scheme/
Ihsan. (2018, December 27). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
Jayanto, Dian Dwi. (2019). Mempertimbangkan Fenomena Populisme Islam di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pertarungan Diskursif: Kontestasi Wacana Politik Antara Gerakan Nasional Pengawal Fatwa Ulama (GNPF-Ulama) dan Nahdlatul Ulama (NU). Jurnal Filsafat, 29(1).
Kersten, C. (2015). Islam in Indonesia: The contest for society, ideas and values. Oxford University Press.
Lefebure, L. D. (Ed.). (2016). Religion, authority, and the state: From Constantine to the contemporary world. Palgrave Macmillan.
Leyaket Ali. (2018, November 9). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
Luqman. (2018, December 27). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
McLuhan, M., & Powers, B. R. (1992). The global village: Transformations in world life and media in the 21th century. Oxford Univ. Press.
Mohamad, M. (2017). Contesting Syariah Laws in Malaysia: Religion, Human Rights and the State’s Response. Journal of Politics and Law, 10(5), 140. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v10n5p140
Mohamed Azam Adil. (2019, December 21). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
Mohammad Hannan Hassan & Irwan Hadi Mohd Shuhaimy. (2018). Developing Asatizah in Singapore through The Asatizah Recognition Scheme. In Norshahril Saat (Ed.), Fulfilling the Trust: 50 Years of Shaping Muslim Religious Life in Sinagapore (pp. 73–78). World Scientific Publishing.
Musa, M. A. (2016, February 4). Enhancing Singapore’s secularism. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/enhancing-singapores-secularism
Nasir, K. M. (2017, March 6). The Singapore Muslim Community and the Imam Issue—The Online Citizen. The Online Citizen. https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2017/03/06/the-singapore-muslim-community-and-the-imam-issue/
Neo, J. L. (2016). Secular Constitutionalism in Singapore: Between Equality and Hierarchy. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 5(3), 431–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rww044
Noor, N. M., & Leong, C.-H. (2013). Multiculturalism in Malaysia and Singapore: Contesting models. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(6), 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.009
Osman Bakar. (2018, December 19). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
Rahmani. (2018, December 4). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
Raz, J. (2009). The authority of law: Essays on law and morality (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Reporters, F. M. T. (2017, October 30). IRF head questions motive behind “tauliah” requirement. Free Malaysia Today. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/10/30/irf-head-questions-motive-behind-tauliah-requirement/
Ruth Wodak. (2001). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
Shashi Jayakumar. (2020). Deradicalisation in Singapore: Past, Present and Future. ICSR King’s College London.
Sholeh. (2018, December 5). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
Steiner, K. (2011). Religion and Politics in Singapore—Matters of National Identity and Security? A Case Study of the Muslim Minority in a Secular State. 58 Osaka University Law Review, 107–134.
Suparno, Basuki Agus. (2010). Kontestasi Makna dan Dramatisme Komunikasi Politik tentang Reformasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1), 1–12.
Tan, C. (2008). (Re)imagining the Muslim Identity in Singapore: (Re)imagining the Muslim Identity in Singapore. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 8(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2008.00002.x
Tannen, D., & Trester, A. M. (Eds.). (2013). Discourse 2.0: Language and new media. Georgetown University Press.
Thameem Ushama. (2018, December 19). Media and the Fragmentation of Religious Authority (Fazlul Rahman, Interviewer) [Personal communication].
Vivienne Wee. (2005). Secular State, Multi-Religious Society: The Patterning of Religion in Singapore. 1–35.
Yacoob Ibrahim. (2018). MUIS at 50: A Personal Reflection. In Norshahril Saat (Ed.), Fulfilling the Trust: 50 Years of Shaping Muslim Religious Life in Singapore. World Scientific Publishing.
Yusoff, K. (2010). Islamic Radicalism in Malaysia: An overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2326–2331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.458
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fazlul Rahman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam DAKWATUNA yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada Priciple Contact.
Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
Semua Informasi yang terdapat di DAKWATUNAÂ bersifat akademik. DAKWATUNAÂ tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalahgunaan informasi dari situs ini.